House endorses P1,000 budget for CHR to bicam


Sharing is caring!

MANILA, Philippines – Toeing the line of Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, the House of Representatives slashed the budget of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) to P1,000 in the proposed 2018 appropriations.

By nominal voting, 119 House members approved the motion of 1-Sagip party list Representative Rodante Marcoleta to give the CHR measly P1,000 appropriations, while 32 lawmakers objected.

The voting was first done through viva voce, and several lawmakers said the louder vote appeared to be the Nay vote opposing the cut. However, Deputy Speaker Eric Singson, the presiding officer, announced that the Ayes vote had it.

In moving to slash the CHR budget, Marcoleta said the rights body failed to act on violations committed by extremist groups such as the Abu Sayyaf and the Maute group.

Cebu Rep. Raul del Mar, the sponsor of the budget, said the CHR’s functions have been misunderstood.

 “We need to be reminded that the CHR’s main function is to curb the excesses and abuses of those in the seat of power,” he said.


Read Also:  Bill wants government officials to take public transport

Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman added that the CHR has no jurisdiction over the violations of the rebel groups.

“The gentleman (Marcoleta) has failed to distinguish the difference between common crimes and violation of human rights. Not all killings and abductions are considered human rights violations,” he said.

Lagman and Del Mar also pointed out that slashing the budget of the CHR to P1,000, which could immobilize it and virtually abolish it, was unconstitutional.

“The CHR is a creation of the 1987 Constitution. We cannot abolish a constitutional office by legislation,” Lagman said.

Buhay party list Rep. Lito Atienza said at no other time that the country needs the CHR than now when there is rampant violation of human rights.

“Let is not be said that in the middle of the night, everyone slept. This representation is awake,” he said.

Created under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the CHR is mandated to conduct investigations on human rights violations against marginalized and vulnerable sectors of the society, involving civil and political rights.

Read Also:  Commission on Human Rights ready to work with Duterte

For 2018, it was seeking a budget of P649.48 million (including retirement and pensions), which was P100 million lower than its 2017 budget.

The floor deliberation on its budget was scheduled on Wednesday, September 6, but was deferred because there were no officials in plenary when the agency was called. Gascon explained that there were given a holding room in the other building, far from the plenary hall, and were not immediately informed that their budget was already up for discussion.

On Thursday, September 7, the body was again scheduled for deliberation, but it was not called. It was rescheduled on September 12, the last day of budget deliberation.

During the committee briefing on its budget in August, Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez said he would give the body a zero budget if the decision were up to him. He chided the body for raising howl on the alleged extra-judicial killings linked to the Duterte administration’s war on drugs while keeping mum on innocent civilians victimized by the criminals.

Read Also:  Human rights defenders to Duterte: Stop bloodshed of suspected criminals, drug offenders

Rep. Lagman said the reduction of the P623.3 million budget of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) to the “minuscule and disgraceful” P1,000 annually is virtually imposing the death penalty on a constitutionally created and mandated independent office.

Emasculating and killing the CHR with an annual budget of P1,000 is unconstitutional because it virtually abolishes a constitutional office by legislative fiat, Lagman added.

“In the midst of unabated extrajudicial killings, torture, enforced disappearances, and other human rights violations, it behooves Congress to ensure that the CHR continue to exercise its constitutionally mandated powers and functions,” he said.

There is a distinction between common crimes and violations of human rights. Not all killings, abductions, and ambushes are considered human rights violations, Lagman pointed out.

Sharing is caring!